Write a brief, 4-to-5-page research paper.
A research paper is not an encyclopedia article. It is not a book review. And it is not an editorial or opinion piece. Rather it is your original analysis of an artwork or corpus in consultation with what other scholars have written in the secondary literature. Put another way, think of your research papers as collectively contributing to a larger scholarly endeavor. In the parlance of ACRL's Framework for Information Literacy for Higher Education, scholarship is a conversation.
I neither expect you to solve problems with which senior scholars continue to grapple nor to have a full grasp of the secondary literature. You can, however, reasonably identify and incorporate into your own analysis the work of four art historians and archaeologists. Feel empowered to join the scholarly conversation!
Specifically, your goal is to advance a coherent and provable thesis supported by a work of art or corpus from ancient Mesoamerica. Your thesis is unlikely to emerge fully formed in a single profound insight. Instead it will come from sustained engagement with artworks and secondary sources. "The thesis will emerge from the process of research" (D'Alleva 2010, 97). Using the analogy of panning for gold, D'Alleva expresses this sentiment in a different way: "We have to sift through a lot of stuff before we come up with the valuable nugget we want" (97). This is a short research paper. Your prose must therefore work double time in service of the thesis. I recommend making an outline and sticking to it. "This will help you to stay on track, even if you end up changing and modifying your ideas as you write" (103). For additional guidance in formulating your thesis and writing your paper:
As you know, information literacy (IL) is an important component of this course. Grades for the research paper are based not only on the quality of the writing and argument but also on your ability to find, evaluate, and property cite academically credible and relevant sources of information. We practiced those skills in the preceding IL assignments.
Outcomes: This assignment combines competencies addressed and practiced earlier in the semester including Information Literacy (e.g., see yourself as beginning to contribute to the scholarly conversation); Global Perspectives (e.g., understand the socio-political contexts and philosophies that underpin Mesoamerican art); and Literary, Visual & Performing Arts (e.g., analyze how Mesoamerican artworks exalted the nobility).
Due date: May 16 (upload to Canvas before midnight)
Criteria | Beginning | Developing | Competent | Excellent |
Thesis (see pp. 97-99 of Look!) | Articulates neither topic nor thesis | Chooses an unmanageable topic and/or thesis unclear | Scope of topic appropriate; thesis clearly articulated | "Competent" plus novel question or argument |
Academic Writing (see pp. 99-106 of Look!) | Successfully completes one element of a research paper | Successfully completes two elements of a research paper | Successfully completes three elements of a research paper | Successfully completes all four elements of a research paper |
Sources Supporting Argument | Sources neither relevant nor scholarly | Sources somewhat relevant; some scholarly | Sources relevant and scholarly but critical work or author missing (e.g., Coe's Art of the Maya Scribe for calligraphy) | Sources relevant, scholarly, and by authors that have made important contributions |
Bibliographic Format | Entries follow no standard format and/or pattern of frequent errors | Entries follow standard CMOS Author-Date format with no more than eight errors | Entries follow standard CMOS Author-Date format with no more than five errors | Entries follow standard CMOS Author-Date format with no more than two errors |